Cerner Corp. v. Visicu, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Cerner Corp. v. Visicu, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedMarch 15, 2012

Docket2011-1209

StatusUnpublished

This text of Cerner Corp. v. Visicu, Inc. (Cerner Corp. v. Visicu, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cerner Corp. v. Visicu, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CERNER CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

VISICU, INC., Defendant-Cross Appellant. ____________________

2011-1209, -1210 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri in No. 04-CV-1033, Judge Gary A. Fenner. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

BART A. STARR, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, L.L.P., of Kansas City, Missouri, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were B. TRENT WEBB, JONATHAN N. ZERGER and RYAN D. DYKAL.

WILLIAM K. WEST, JR., Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant- cross appellant. Of counsel on the brief were ALAN M. GRIMALDI, BRIAN A. ROSENTHAL and ROBERT E. MCBRIDE, Mayer Brown, LLP, of Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LINN, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 15, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI