Cermak v. Hertz Corp.
147 A.2d 795, 28 N.J. 568, 1959 N.J. LEXIS 252
Opinions
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cermak v. Hertz Corp., 147 A.2d 795, 28 N.J. 568, 1959 N.J. LEXIS 252 (N.J. 1959).
147 A.2d 795 (Cermak v. Hertz Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ming Yu He v. Miller
24 A.3d 251 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2011)
Pellicer v. St. Barnabas Hospital
974 A.2d 1070 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2009)
Caldwell v. Haynes
643 A.2d 564 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1994)
State v. Anderson
603 A.2d 928 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1992)
Van Dyke v. Bolves
258 A.2d 372 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)
Francis Hanley v. Herbert L. Heckler
380 F.2d 986 (Third Circuit, 1967)
Barry v. THE COCA COLA CO.
239 A.2d 273 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)
Ardis v. Reed
206 A.2d 890 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1965)
Moran v. Feitis
174 A.2d 618 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Lino v. Morris
171 A.2d 673 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Andryishyn v. Ballinger
160 A.2d 867 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)
Cermak v. Hertz Corp.
147 A.2d 795 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1959)