Sharp v. Public Service Railway Co.
160 A. 492, 109 N.J.L. 272, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 330
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — -The Chief Justice, Tbenohaed, Campbell, Case, Bodine, Donges, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sharp v. Public Service Railway Co., 160 A. 492, 109 N.J.L. 272, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 330 (N.J. 1932).
160 A. 492 (Sharp v. Public Service Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cermak v. Hertz Corp.
147 A.2d 795 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1959)