Celsis in Vitro, Inc. v. Cellzdirect, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Celsis in Vitro, Inc. v. Cellzdirect, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 664 F.3d 922
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided June 24, 2011·No. 2011-1337·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit CELSIS IN VITRO, INC., Plain,tiff-Appello:nt, V. CELLZDIRECT, INC. AND INVITROGEN CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees. 2011-1337 ` Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in case no. 10-CV-4053, Senior Judge Milton I. Shadur. ON MOTION ORDER Celsis in Vitro, Inc. moves to expedite the appeal, in- cluding the briefing schedule and oral argument Celsis filed its brief early, thereby self-expediting the case Celsis has not shown that the time for CellzDirect, lnc. and Invitrogen Corporation to file their brief should be shortened. Ce1lzDirect, Inc. and InVitrogen Corpora- tion should not anticipate any extensions of time to file

CELSIS IN VITRO V. CELLZDlRECT 2 their brief. The case will be placed on the next available oral argument calendar after the briefing is comp1eted, which is the usual course, and thus no motion is neces- sary to obtain that relief. Accordingly, IT ls ORDERED THAT: The motion is denied. FOR THE COURT JUN 2 4 2511 /S/ Jan H@rba1y Date J an Horbaly ` Clerk cc: Rip Finst, Esq. Jordan A. Sigale, Esq. ` 324 u.s. conf i)'F1ii=)FeALs ron `l'HE FEDERA1_ C|RCUlT .1uN 24 2011 JAN HORBAL¥ CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Celsis in Vitro, Inc. v. Cellzdirect, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Celsis in Vitro, Inc. v. Cellzdirect, Inc. (Celsis in Vitro, Inc. v. Cellzdirect, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.