Celsis in Vitro, Inc. v. CellzDirect, Inc.

664 F.3d 922, 395 F. App'x 701, 2012 WL 34381

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Celsis in Vitro, Inc. v. CellzDirect, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 664 F.3d 922 →

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided September 23, 2010·No. 2010-1547·Unpublished

Opinion

Before PROST, Circuit Judge.

ON MOTION

ORDER

CellzDirect, Inc. and Invitrogen Corporation (CellzDirect) submit a motion for a stay, pending appeal, of the preliminary injunction issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) Celsis In Vitro, Inc. is directed to respond no later than October 8, 2010.

(2) The injunction is temporarily stayed, pending the court’s receipt of the response and the court’s consideration of the papers submitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Before PROST, Circuit Judge.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) Celsis In Vitro, Inc. is directed to respond no later than October 8, 2010.

(2) The injunction is temporarily stayed, pending the court’s receipt of the response and the court’s consideration of the papers submitted.

Celsis in Vitro, Inc. v. CellzDirect, Inc., 664 F.3d 922, 395 F. App'x 701, 2012 WL 34381 (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Pincite

664 F.3d 922 (Celsis in Vitro, Inc. v. CellzDirect, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.