Celsis in Vitro, Inc. v. CellzDirect, Inc.

664 F.3d 922, 395 F. App'x 701, 2012 WL 34381
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedSeptember 23, 2010
Docket2010-1547
StatusUnpublished

This text of 664 F.3d 922 (Celsis in Vitro, Inc. v. CellzDirect, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Celsis in Vitro, Inc. v. CellzDirect, Inc., 664 F.3d 922, 395 F. App'x 701, 2012 WL 34381 (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Opinion

Before PROST, Circuit Judge.

ON MOTION

ORDER

CellzDirect, Inc. and Invitrogen Corporation (CellzDirect) submit a motion for a stay, pending appeal, of the preliminary injunction issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) Celsis In Vitro, Inc. is directed to respond no later than October 8, 2010.

(2) The injunction is temporarily stayed, pending the court’s receipt of the response and the court’s consideration of the papers submitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
664 F.3d 922, 395 F. App'x 701, 2012 WL 34381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/celsis-in-vitro-inc-v-cellzdirect-inc-cafc-2010.