Castle Shannon Coal Corp. v. Upper St. Clair Township

370 Pa. 211
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 22, 1952
DocketAppeal, No. 60
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 370 Pa. 211 (Castle Shannon Coal Corp. v. Upper St. Clair Township) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Castle Shannon Coal Corp. v. Upper St. Clair Township, 370 Pa. 211 (Pa. 1952).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

This Court in Mutual Supply Company Appeal, 366 Pa. 424, 77 A. 2d 612, decided in a zoning litigation that the board of adjustment was not guilty of a manifest and flagrant abuse of discretion in refusing to grant a certificate of variance. In that case the Castle Shannon Coal Corporation, the present appellant, the owner of certain coal lands, through the Mutual Supply Company, purchased certain surface land and applied for a building permit authorizing the construction of a tipple and accessory buildings. Such structures would have been in violation of the zoning ordinances of Upper St. Clair Township. As above stated, a variance was properly refused.

According to.the present record the Castle Shannon Coal Company, following the foregoing decision, purchased another tract of surface land within the same zoned residential single family dwelling district and has filed a petition for declaratory judgment to determine the validity of the township zoning ordinance. The court below, upon preliminary objections, dismissed the petition upon the ground that under the Declaratory Judgment Act of June 18, 1923, P. L. 840, 12 PS 831, as amended, such form of remedy is not available where a statute provides a special form of remedy for a specific type of case.

The Second Class Township Code of May 1, 1933 P. L. 103, 53 PS 19093, provides specific remedies and procedure for testing the validity of zoning ordinances. When a statute designates a specific procedure, the remedy so provided is exclusive: Griffith v. McCandless Township, 366 Pa. 309, 77 A. 2d 430, and cases [213]*213therein cited. See also; Gerety Estate, 349 Pa. 417, 37 A. 2d 792; Keefer Estate, 351 Pa. 343, 41 A. 2d 666.

The order is affirmed at the cost of appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parts v. Mt. Joy Township
18 Pa. D. & C.3d 467 (Adams County Court of Common Pleas, 1981)
Kehler Estate
1 Pa. D. & C.3d 132 (Northumberland County Court of Common Pleas, 1977)
Loucks v. Crowther
32 Pa. D. & C.2d 570 (Chester County Court of Common Pleas, 1963)
Johnson Estate
171 A.2d 518 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1961)
Stoutenburgh v. Upper Moreland-Hatboro Joint Sewer Authority
159 A.2d 250 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1960)
Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Clairton
133 A.2d 542 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1957)
Knup v. Philadelphia
126 A.2d 399 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1956)
Strawbridge v. Horsham Township
7 Pa. D. & C.2d 161 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1955)
Gardner v. Allegheny County
114 A.2d 491 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1955)
Fox v. Warrington Township Zoning Board
3 Pa. D. & C.2d 1 (Bucks County Court of Common Pleas, 1955)
Upper St. Clair Township Appeal
172 Pa. Super. 295 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1953)
Boggs v. Werner
94 A.2d 50 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1953)
Wyszynski v. Philadelphia
89 A.2d 355 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
370 Pa. 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castle-shannon-coal-corp-v-upper-st-clair-township-pa-1952.