Keefer Estate

41 A.2d 666, 351 Pa. 343, 1945 Pa. LEXIS 332
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 29, 1944
DocketAppeal, 236
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 41 A.2d 666 (Keefer Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keefer Estate, 41 A.2d 666, 351 Pa. 343, 1945 Pa. LEXIS 332 (Pa. 1944).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearns,

The question is whether a case for declaratory judgment is presented.

The controversy concerns the construction of a will. Decedent was the executor of his wife’s estate. Upon *344 her decease he administered the estate and after filing an account made absolute distribution to himself. The husband died over three years after such distribution. Appellant, who claims under the wife’s will, contends that under its terms decedent did not possess an absolute estate in the residue, but possessed only a life estate.

In Ray’s Estate, 345 Pa. 210, 25 A. 2d 803, we decided that where a fiduciary has complied with the Fiduciaries Act of June 7, 1917, P. L. 447, 20 PS section 862, and has received no notice of claims, he may properly make distribution even without an accounting.

In counties not having a separate orphans’ court, where a dispute arises over distribution, the court refers the audit of the account and all questions of distribution to an auditor. In counties with a separate orphans’ court such matters are presented at the audit of the account.

In the present case the Orphans’ Court of Cumberland County, not being a separate orphans’ court, was in error in construing the will and decreeing distribution under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act of June 18, 1923, P. L. 840, 12 PS section 831, et seq., as amended. We pointed out in Gerety Estate, 349 Pa. 417, 37 A. 2d 792, that “the remedy under the Declaratory Judgments Acts is not an optional substitute for established and available remedies” or “where another statutory remedy has been specifically provided”. The Orphans’ Court Act of June 7, 1917, P. L. 363, 20 PS section 2082, et seq., and the Fiduciaries Act, supra, direct precisely how a decedent’s estate shall be settled and distributed.

The appropriate place to pass upon the matters now in controversy is at the audit of the account which has already been filed, where all parties in interest will receive statutory notice and be given the opportunity to be heard. An account can only be audited and distribution decreed in a decedent’s estate in the manner specifically provided by the statute.

*345 The appeal is sustained; the decree reversed without prejudice and the record remitted. Each party to pay his own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kehler Estate
1 Pa. D. & C.3d 132 (Northumberland County Court of Common Pleas, 1977)
Johnson Estate
171 A.2d 518 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1961)
Taubel Estate
21 Pa. D. & C.2d 446 (Montgomery County Orphans' Court, 1960)
In re Bruno
20 Pa. D. & C.2d 602 (Philadelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1958)
Gardner v. Allegheny County
114 A.2d 491 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1955)
O'Brien Estate
112 A.2d 178 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1955)
Lifter Estate
81 Pa. D. & C. 433 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1952)
Wyszynski v. Philadelphia
89 A.2d 355 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1952)
Castle Shannon Coal Corp. v. Upper St. Clair Township
370 Pa. 211 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1952)
SHEERIN v. Beattie
76 A.2d 206 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1950)
American Casualty Co. v. KLIGERMAN
74 A.2d 169 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1950)
Colove v. Robesonia Borough
73 A.2d 679 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1950)
Thompson Estate
360 Pa. 566 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1949)
Thopson Estate
63 A.2d 55 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1948)
Jacobs' Estate
58 Pa. D. & C. 577 (Huntingdon County Orphans' Court, 1947)
Fahey Estate
52 A.2d 580 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 A.2d 666, 351 Pa. 343, 1945 Pa. LEXIS 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keefer-estate-pa-1944.