Castillo v. Weissberg

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHANNA CASTILLO, Plaintiff, -against- 19-CV-7959 (CM) JAN WEISSBERG, General Manager; ORDER OF DISMISSAL ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE CORPORATION, Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated October 16, 2019, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within sixty days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i1). The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state-law claims that Plaintiff may be asserting. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: December 30, 2019 New York, New York hie. hb Wek Chief United States District Judge