Carter v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Carter v. State

463 S.W.3d 810, 2015 WL 1742881

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carter v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 540 S.W.3d 506 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 14, 2015·No. ED 100855·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Latoya Carter appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying her Rule 24.035¹ motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Latoya Carter appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying her Rule 24.035¹ motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b).

Carter v. State, 463 S.W.3d 810, 2015 WL 1742881 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

463 S.W.3d 810 (Carter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.