Carter v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Carter v. State

367 S.W.3d 182, 2012 WL 1995788, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 763

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carter v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1148 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 5, 2012·No. No. WD 74281·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Anthony D. Carter appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the motion court’s ruling is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Anthony D. Carter appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the motion court’s ruling is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Carter v. State, 367 S.W.3d 182, 2012 WL 1995788, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 763 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

367 S.W.3d 182 (Carter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.