Carter v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Carter v. State

448 S.W.3d 360, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1278, 2014 WL 5860801

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 12, 2014·No. WD 76804·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Carter appeals from the Circuit Court of Lafayette County’s dismissal of his Rule 24.085 motion for post-conviction relief based upon a finding that it was untimely filed. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Carter appeals from the Circuit Court of Lafayette County’s dismissal of his Rule 24.085 motion for post-conviction relief based upon a finding that it was untimely filed. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Carter v. State, 448 S.W.3d 360, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1278, 2014 WL 5860801 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

448 S.W.3d 360 (Carter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.