Carter v. State

60 S.E. 123, 3 Ga. App. 476, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 343
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 27, 1908·No. 858·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. The evidence as specifically set forth by the county judge • in his answer to the writ of certiorari is conclusive, unless traversed, and a reviewing court will not look to the evidence as set forth in the petition for certiorari to add to or in any manner to change the evidence as set forth in the answer. Evans v. Forsyth, 126 Ga. 589 (55 S. E. 490); Brown v. Gainesville, 125 Ga. 238 (53 S. E. 1002).

2. Where the evidence as set forth in the answer to the writ of certiorari, although weak, is sufficient to support the finding; and the only error assigned is that such finding was not supported by the evidence, this court will not interfere with the judgment of the superior court overruling the certiorari. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carter v. State, 60 S.E. 123, 3 Ga. App. 476, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 343 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

60 S.E. 123 (Carter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mons v. State
66 S.E.2d 159 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Goodwin v. State
191 S.E. 287 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Smith v. Richards
166 S.E. 249 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Bishop v. State
161 S.E. 271 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Davis v. Sawtell
66 S.E. 809 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)