Brown v. City of Gainesville

53 S.E. 1002, 125 Ga. 238, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 105
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 10, 1906·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Cobb, P. J.

1. “Points made in a petition for certiorari not verified by the answer of the trial judge present nothing for determination either by the superior or the Supreme Court.” Little v. Fort Valley, 123 Ga. 503.

2. When an answer to a petition for certiorari does not verify an allegation in the petition that there was a final judgment rendered, and no steps are taken to perfect the answer, neither the superior court nor the Supreme Court can properly undertake to pass on the merits of the assignments of error made in the petition. Jessey v. Dean, 122 Ga. 371.

Judgment in each case affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. City of Gainesville, 53 S.E. 1002, 125 Ga. 238, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 105 (Ga. 1906).

53 S.E. 1002 (Brown v. City of Gainesville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rutland v. City of Dublin
177 S.E. 819 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Davis v. Thompson
82 S.E. 595 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Bennett v. Griner
81 S.E. 363 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Carter v. State
60 S.E. 123 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Thompson v. Becham
58 S.E. 311 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Landrum v. Moss
57 S.E. 965 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Raymond v. Garden
55 S.E. 944 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)