Davis v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Davis v. Thompson

82 S.E. 595, 15 Ga. App. 55, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 13

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedAugust 22, 1914

Docket5705

StatusPublished

This text of 82 S.E. 595 (Davis v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Thompson, 82 S.E. 595, 15 Ga. App. 55, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 13 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, J.

1. There was ho traverse to the answer of the magistrate; and

since the answer not only fails to verify the assignments of error as to rulings at the trial, but distinctly denies that the rulings complained of were made, neither the superior court nor this court can consider these assignments of error. Bennett v. Griner, 14 Ga. App. 429 (81 S. E. 363) ; Brown v. Gainesville, 125 Ga. 238 (53 S. E. 1003); Knowles v. Coachman, 109 Ga. 358 (34 S. E. 607) ; Hopkins v. Southern Railway Co., 110 Ga. 87 (35 S. E. 307); Jones v. Rome, ante, 41 (82 S. E. 593).

2. It does not appear, from the answer of the magistrate to the writ of certiorari, that any material error was. committed on the trial; and since there was sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict rendered, under the repeated rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court we will not disturb the judgment of the judge of the superior court in overruling the certiorari. Judgment affirmed.

Roan, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wade, J.

1. There was ho traverse to the answer of the magistrate; and

since the answer not only fails to verify the assignments of error as to rulings at the trial, but distinctly denies that the rulings complained of were made, neither the superior court nor this court can consider these assignments of error. Bennett v. Griner, 14 Ga. App. 429 (81 S. E. 363) ; Brown v. Gainesville, 125 Ga. 238 (53 S. E. 1003); Knowles v. Coachman, 109 Ga. 358 (34 S. E. 607) ; Hopkins v. Southern Railway Co., 110 Ga. 87 (35 S. E. 307); Jones v. Rome, ante, 41 (82 S. E. 593).

2. It does not appear, from the answer of the magistrate to the writ of certiorari, that any material error was. committed on the trial; and since there was sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict rendered, under the repeated rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court we will not disturb the judgment of the judge of the superior court in overruling the certiorari. Judgment affirmed.

Roan, J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 S.E. 595, 15 Ga. App. 55, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-thompson-gactapp-1914.

Opinion

1. There was ho traverse to the answer of the magistrate; and

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack