Davis v. Sawtell

66 S.E. 809, 7 Ga. App. 313, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 257
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 21, 1910
Docket2046
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 66 S.E. 809 (Davis v. Sawtell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Sawtell, 66 S.E. 809, 7 Ga. App. 313, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 257 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

Hill, O. J. 1.

Where suit is brought in a justice’s court on an unverified open account, and the plaintiff introduces testimony and fails to prove the justness and correctness of the account, and the justice renders judgment in favor of the defendant for costs of suit, this does not operate as a dismissal of the suit, but is a judgment from which plaintiff may, as matter of right, enter an appeal to a jury in that court. Civil Code, §4140.

2. The untraversed answer of the magistrate whose judgment is sought to be reviewed on certiorari is conclusive as to the facts. Carter v. State, 3 Ga. App. 476 (60 S. E. 123) ; Evans v. Forsyth, 126 Ga. 589 (55 S. E. 490).

3. The certiorari in this case involved no question of fact, and the final judgment as rendered by the judge of the superior court was the only judgment that could have been legally rendered.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hambrick v. State
72 S.E.2d 833 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Mons v. State
66 S.E.2d 159 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 S.E. 809, 7 Ga. App. 313, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-sawtell-gactapp-1910.