Carter v. State
32 So. 3d 67, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9353, 2009 WL 1940793
Opinion
Michael Andrew Carter appeals his conviction and sentence for robbery with a weapon. We affirm. Mr. Carter correctly notes, however, that the written judgment mistakenly reflects a conviction for robbery with a firearm or deadly weapon instead of robbery with a weapon. See § 812.13(2)(a), (b), Fla. Stat. (2006). As the State concedes, remand is necessary to correct this scrivener’s error. See Flesner v. State, 890 So.2d 331, 332 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).
Affirmed, but remanded for correction of scrivener’s error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carter v. State, 32 So. 3d 67, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9353, 2009 WL 1940793 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
32 So. 3d 67 (Carter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mann v. State
62 So. 3d 1240 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Dixon v. State
32 So. 3d 67 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)