Carter v. State

918 So. 2d 389, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 43, 2006 WL 26186
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 6, 2006
DocketNo. 1D05-3818
StatusPublished

This text of 918 So. 2d 389 (Carter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carter v. State, 918 So. 2d 389, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 43, 2006 WL 26186 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the lower tribunal’s order scheduling a hearing on petitioner’s motion to correct illegal sentence, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot.

KAHN, C.J., WEBSTER and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
918 So. 2d 389, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 43, 2006 WL 26186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.