Carter v. State
425 So. 2d 633, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27756
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carter v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 452 So. 2d 953 →
Opinion
We remand to strike from the order of probation revocation the finding that appellant violated his probation by failing to pay supervision costs. The state failed to present evidence establishing appellant’s ability to pay. Watkins v. State, 368 So.2d 363 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). We, however, affirm the revocation order and judgment based on the trial court’s findings that appellant: (1) failed to submit monthly reports; (2) changed his residence without consent; and (3) was charged by information with burglary and armed robbery.
REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carter v. State, 425 So. 2d 633, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27756 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
425 So. 2d 633 (Carter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Watkins v. State
368 So. 2d 363 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)