Carter v. State
403 So. 2d 582, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21052
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carter v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 380 So. 2d 541 →
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of burglary. At trial he requested the court to instruct the jury as to the maximum and minimum sentences which could be imposed upon conviction. The court’s denial of that request was error, Tascano v. State, 393 So.2d 540 (Fla.1980), requiring that we reverse the judgment and remand this cause to the trial court for a new trial. This disposition of the case makes it unnecessary to reach the other issues raised on appeal.
REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR A NEW TRIAL.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carter v. State, 403 So. 2d 582, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21052 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).
403 So. 2d 582 (Carter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tascano v. State
393 So. 2d 540 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)