Carter v. State

425 So. 2d 633, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27756
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 21, 1983
DocketNo. 82-688
StatusPublished

This text of 425 So. 2d 633 (Carter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carter v. State, 425 So. 2d 633, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27756 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We remand to strike from the order of probation revocation the finding that appellant violated his probation by failing to pay supervision costs. The state failed to present evidence establishing appellant’s ability to pay. Watkins v. State, 368 So.2d 363 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). We, however, affirm the revocation order and judgment based on the trial court’s findings that appellant: (1) failed to submit monthly reports; (2) changed his residence without consent; and (3) was charged by information with burglary and armed robbery.

REMANDED.

OTT, C.J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watkins v. State
368 So. 2d 363 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
425 So. 2d 633, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.