UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X : DARRYL C. CARTER, : : Plaintiff, : : 23-CV-10887 (JMF) -v- : : MEMORANDUM OPINION MOLLY WASOW PARK, et al., : AND ORDER TO : SHOW CAUSE Defendants. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: On March 26, 2024, the Court entered an Order vacating its prior endorsement granting Plaintiff permission for electronic case filing. See ECF No. 17. Noting that Plaintiff had emailed a submission directly to Chambers and that the submission contained “inappropriate and inflammatory language,” the Order also reminded Plaintiff that, as a pro se litigant, he is not permitted to directly contact Chambers and that all communications with the Court must be made through the Pro Se Office in accordance with the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Pro Se Cases. The Order explicitly warned that “[f]ailure to comply with this Order and those restrictions, and future filings of an inappropriate or inflammatory nature, may result in sanctions, including dismissal of this case.” Id. at 2. Later the same day, Plaintiff sent another email to Chambers with a “filing” attached. The Court entered an Order noting that it presumed Plaintiff had not yet seen its earlier Order and, thus, would “not take any steps except to reiterate its warning that failure to comply with the restrictions on direct contact with Chambers may result in sanctions.” ECF No. 18. The very next day, in blatant violation of the Court’s Orders and disregard of its warnings, Plaintiff sent another email with an attached “filing” directly to Chambers (allegedly copying Senator Kirsten Gillibrand and the Department of Justice). The email and attachment, copies of which are attached as Exhibit A, contain even more offensive and inflammatory language, including racist epithets and direct attacks against this tribunal. In the email, Plaintiff also states: “since I do not have a right of access to the courts, I am addressing this matter via
email. And you dirty whites can close this case too.” The Court construes this statement to mean that Plaintiff wishes to voluntarily dismiss this matter pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If that is not the case, and Plaintiff wishes to continue prosecuting this case, he shall file a letter to that effect no later than April 11, 2024. In any such letter, Plaintiff shall also show cause why this case should not be dismissed as a sanction for his failure to comply with the Court’s prior Orders and for his continued use of inappropriate, offensive, and vulgar language in Court submissions. See, e.g., Leibovitz v. City of New York, No. 15-CV-546 (LGS) (HBP), 2019 WL 4307305, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 27, 2019) (dismissing where the plaintiff persisted, despite prior warnings, “in using inappropriate, crude or profane language in his communications”), report and
recommendation adopted, 2019 WL 4303343 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 11, 2019); Cameron v. Lambert, No. 07-CV-9258 (DC), 2008 WL 4823596, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2008) (“Pursuant to its inherent power, a court may impose sanctions against a party for acting in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or for oppressive reasons and for misconduct during the course of litigation.” (cleaned up)). Failure to show cause by the deadline will result in dismissal without further notice. Plaintiff is reminded — for at least the third time — that he may not contact Chambers directly in any way, including but not limited to telephone, email, or regular mail. Instead, all communications with the Court must be made through the Pro Se Office in accordance with the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Pro Se Cases. Failure to comply with this Order and those restrictions may result in sanctions, including dismissal of this case. Furthermore, lest there be any doubt: Plaintiff shall not use inappropriate, vulgar, crude, profane, or offensive language in his filings or in any other communications with the Court or Court personnel. Continued use of such language will result in dismissal and may also result in a filing injunction prohibiting Plaintiff from filing any lawsuit in this Court without prior leave of the Court. See, e.g., Lead Creation Inc. v. Hangzhou Yueji E-Com. Co., No. 22-CV-10377 (JMF), 2023 WL 7413835, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 11, 2023) (“It is well established that the Court has inherent authority to impose sanctions to deter abuse of the judicial process, which may include limiting a litigant’s access to the judicial system.” (cleaned up)); Shukla v. Apple Inc., No. 21-CV-3287 (JMF), 2021 WL 5281371, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 12, 2021) (“It is well established that a district court may, in its discretion, impose sanctions, including a litigation bar, against litigants who abuse the judicial process, by filing vexatious, harassing or duplicative lawsuits, causing needless expense to other parties or posing an unnecessary burden on the courts and their personnel.” (cleaned up)). This Court certifies, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and in forma pauperis status is thus denied. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff.
SO ORDERED. Dated: March 29, 2024 New York, New York ESSE M-fFURMAN nited States District Judge
EXHIBIT A FTroo:m: DSeanrraytlo Cr GCiallribterarnd; Furman NYSD Chambers; USDOJ Criminal Division Subject: Pro Se Filing, 23-cv-10887-JMF, Third Notice Documents not Filed, White Cover Up Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2024 1:21:09 PM Attachments: 23cv10887_notice-fraud-032624.pdf CAUTION - EXTERNAL: Senator Gillibrand, This is only FYI as the above reproach courts are involved albeit this involves criminal violations from the bench. This case is a sham, a cover up and a fraud involving criminal misconduct from the bench. The department of justice is copied. And I do not have to tolerate abuse of power, oppression, and corruption by any public official. And since I do not have a right of access to the courts, I am addressing this matter via email. And you dirty whites can close this case too. Regards, Darryl ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Darryl C Carter Date: Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 12:42 PM Subject: Fwd: Pro Se Filing, 23-cv-10887-JMF, Third Notice Documents not Filed, White Cover Up Mighty Whitey Cover up. Did you see the Order by this punk ass judge issued on March 26, 2026? Take a look, this is a punk ass white boy cover up judge who is toting the line for white Molly Park and their negroe alliance in HRA. They have been covering up the fact that I DO NOT live in the Bronx, NY. This is all a sham and fraud my mighty whitey to protect White Molly Park and their black alliance. Thanks, mighty whitey. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Darryl C Carter Filing attached. CAUTION - EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated outside the Judiciary. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links. Page 1 of 8 March 26, 2024 @ 12:52:30 PM
Ruby J. Krajick Clerk of Court United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007-1312 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL VIA Temporary_Pro_Se_Filing@nysd.uscourts.gov RE: Darryl C. Carter v. Molly W. Park et al, Civil Action #: 23-CV-10887- JMF: Order Granting CM/ECF Filing Dear Clerk Krajick: 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X : DARRYL C. CARTER, : : Plaintiff, : : 23-CV-10887 (JMF) -v- : : MEMORANDUM OPINION MOLLY WASOW PARK, et al., : AND ORDER TO : SHOW CAUSE Defendants. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: On March 26, 2024, the Court entered an Order vacating its prior endorsement granting Plaintiff permission for electronic case filing. See ECF No. 17. Noting that Plaintiff had emailed a submission directly to Chambers and that the submission contained “inappropriate and inflammatory language,” the Order also reminded Plaintiff that, as a pro se litigant, he is not permitted to directly contact Chambers and that all communications with the Court must be made through the Pro Se Office in accordance with the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Pro Se Cases. The Order explicitly warned that “[f]ailure to comply with this Order and those restrictions, and future filings of an inappropriate or inflammatory nature, may result in sanctions, including dismissal of this case.” Id. at 2. Later the same day, Plaintiff sent another email to Chambers with a “filing” attached. The Court entered an Order noting that it presumed Plaintiff had not yet seen its earlier Order and, thus, would “not take any steps except to reiterate its warning that failure to comply with the restrictions on direct contact with Chambers may result in sanctions.” ECF No. 18. The very next day, in blatant violation of the Court’s Orders and disregard of its warnings, Plaintiff sent another email with an attached “filing” directly to Chambers (allegedly copying Senator Kirsten Gillibrand and the Department of Justice). The email and attachment, copies of which are attached as Exhibit A, contain even more offensive and inflammatory language, including racist epithets and direct attacks against this tribunal. In the email, Plaintiff also states: “since I do not have a right of access to the courts, I am addressing this matter via
email. And you dirty whites can close this case too.” The Court construes this statement to mean that Plaintiff wishes to voluntarily dismiss this matter pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If that is not the case, and Plaintiff wishes to continue prosecuting this case, he shall file a letter to that effect no later than April 11, 2024. In any such letter, Plaintiff shall also show cause why this case should not be dismissed as a sanction for his failure to comply with the Court’s prior Orders and for his continued use of inappropriate, offensive, and vulgar language in Court submissions. See, e.g., Leibovitz v. City of New York, No. 15-CV-546 (LGS) (HBP), 2019 WL 4307305, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 27, 2019) (dismissing where the plaintiff persisted, despite prior warnings, “in using inappropriate, crude or profane language in his communications”), report and
recommendation adopted, 2019 WL 4303343 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 11, 2019); Cameron v. Lambert, No. 07-CV-9258 (DC), 2008 WL 4823596, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2008) (“Pursuant to its inherent power, a court may impose sanctions against a party for acting in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or for oppressive reasons and for misconduct during the course of litigation.” (cleaned up)). Failure to show cause by the deadline will result in dismissal without further notice. Plaintiff is reminded — for at least the third time — that he may not contact Chambers directly in any way, including but not limited to telephone, email, or regular mail. Instead, all communications with the Court must be made through the Pro Se Office in accordance with the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Pro Se Cases. Failure to comply with this Order and those restrictions may result in sanctions, including dismissal of this case. Furthermore, lest there be any doubt: Plaintiff shall not use inappropriate, vulgar, crude, profane, or offensive language in his filings or in any other communications with the Court or Court personnel. Continued use of such language will result in dismissal and may also result in a filing injunction prohibiting Plaintiff from filing any lawsuit in this Court without prior leave of the Court. See, e.g., Lead Creation Inc. v. Hangzhou Yueji E-Com. Co., No. 22-CV-10377 (JMF), 2023 WL 7413835, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 11, 2023) (“It is well established that the Court has inherent authority to impose sanctions to deter abuse of the judicial process, which may include limiting a litigant’s access to the judicial system.” (cleaned up)); Shukla v. Apple Inc., No. 21-CV-3287 (JMF), 2021 WL 5281371, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 12, 2021) (“It is well established that a district court may, in its discretion, impose sanctions, including a litigation bar, against litigants who abuse the judicial process, by filing vexatious, harassing or duplicative lawsuits, causing needless expense to other parties or posing an unnecessary burden on the courts and their personnel.” (cleaned up)). This Court certifies, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and in forma pauperis status is thus denied. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff.
SO ORDERED. Dated: March 29, 2024 New York, New York ESSE M-fFURMAN nited States District Judge
EXHIBIT A FTroo:m: DSeanrraytlo Cr GCiallribterarnd; Furman NYSD Chambers; USDOJ Criminal Division Subject: Pro Se Filing, 23-cv-10887-JMF, Third Notice Documents not Filed, White Cover Up Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2024 1:21:09 PM Attachments: 23cv10887_notice-fraud-032624.pdf CAUTION - EXTERNAL: Senator Gillibrand, This is only FYI as the above reproach courts are involved albeit this involves criminal violations from the bench. This case is a sham, a cover up and a fraud involving criminal misconduct from the bench. The department of justice is copied. And I do not have to tolerate abuse of power, oppression, and corruption by any public official. And since I do not have a right of access to the courts, I am addressing this matter via email. And you dirty whites can close this case too. Regards, Darryl ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Darryl C Carter Date: Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 12:42 PM Subject: Fwd: Pro Se Filing, 23-cv-10887-JMF, Third Notice Documents not Filed, White Cover Up Mighty Whitey Cover up. Did you see the Order by this punk ass judge issued on March 26, 2026? Take a look, this is a punk ass white boy cover up judge who is toting the line for white Molly Park and their negroe alliance in HRA. They have been covering up the fact that I DO NOT live in the Bronx, NY. This is all a sham and fraud my mighty whitey to protect White Molly Park and their black alliance. Thanks, mighty whitey. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Darryl C Carter Filing attached. CAUTION - EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated outside the Judiciary. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links. Page 1 of 8 March 26, 2024 @ 12:52:30 PM
Ruby J. Krajick Clerk of Court United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007-1312 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL VIA Temporary_Pro_Se_Filing@nysd.uscourts.gov RE: Darryl C. Carter v. Molly W. Park et al, Civil Action #: 23-CV-10887- JMF: Order Granting CM/ECF Filing Dear Clerk Krajick: 1. With respect to the above referenced case, there is a problem with fraud in the pro se unit of this court regarding the routing and handling of filings and related access, thereto, which must be promptly addressed. 2. This fraud problem with the pro se unit has spilled over into the CM/ECF HelpDesk which apparently does not know how to assign CM/ECF filing access despite the attached court Order. This issue must likewise be promptly addressed. 3. And for the record the address associated with this case which needs to be properly updated on the docket is as follows: 1. Darryl Chadwich Carter 690 Albany Avenue, Apt. 2K Brooklyn, NY 11203-2155 Page 2 of 8 Note the address mentioned, ante, has been the case for sometime, now, and has, also, been updated in the PACER system for quite a while now. Here again, these issues are directly related to fraud and criminal misconduct within the clerk's office and in particular the pro se unit. Sincerely,
Darryl C. Carter Encl: CM/ECF Order doc #16, two (3) pages, ECF HelpDesk Response(s) three (3) pages
690 Albany Avenue, Apt. 2K Brooklyn, NY 11203-2155
Page 1 of 6 March 26, 2024 @ 12:34:00 PM
Help Desk United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007-1312 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL VIA HelpDesk@nysd.uscourts.gov
RE: Darryl C. Carter v. Molly W. Park et al, Civil Action #: 23-CV-10887- JMF: Order Granting CM/ECF Filing Dear NYSD HelpDesk: Please note the attached Order, Doc #16, Granting CM/ECF. As Iam currently a filer in this court, 1am unable to request access via Pacer, as the Pacer system recognizes that I am already a filer in this Court. In this case, I am forwarding the request directly to you for fulfillment and the requested case access is listed on the Order itself. Moreover, the case number is listed above, and is Darryl C. Carter v. Molly W. Park, 23-cv-10887-]MF. Your assistance fulfilling this request as soon as possible is appreciated. Sincerely,
Lhe CE) Phe
Darryl C. Carter Encl: CM/ECF Order doc #16, two (2) pages, ECF HelpDesk Response(s) three (3) pages
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Darryl Chadwich Carter
Write the full name of each plaintiff or petitioner. No. 23. CV 10887 sae MOTION FOR PERMISSION FOR Molly Wasow Park ELECTRONIC CASE FILING
Write the full name of each defendant or respondent. I respectfully ask the Court for permission to participate in electronic case filing (“e-filing”) in this case. I affirm under penalty of perjury that: 1. Ihave reviewed the Court’s Electronic Case Filing Rules & Instructions, available at http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf filing.php, and agree to abide by them. 2. I completed the Court’s CM/ECF introduction course! on 12/28/2022 3. Ihave submitted a Non-Attorney E-File Registration for the PACER system at https://www.pacer.gov/reg_nonatty.html. 4. I understand that once I register for e-filing, I will receive notices and documents only by e-mail in this case and not by regular mail. 5. Tunderstand that if am granted permission to participate in e-filing, I must file my documents electronically and I may not submit documents to the Pro Se Intake Unit for scanning and docketing. 6. I know how to convert a document to PDF-A format. 7. [have regular access to the technical requirements necessary to e-file successfully: a computer with internet access and a word processor type of computer I will be using: Wintel based PC
! You may register for the course on the Court's website: http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_training.php. SDNY Rev: 10/4/18
type of word processor I will be using: Michasort Word 2012 or eampalible
an e-mail account (on a daily basis) to receive notifications from the Court and notices from the e-filing system a scanner to convert documents that are only in paper format into electronic files scanning equipment I will be using: Flatbed hardware mi a PDF reader and a PDF writer to convert word-processing documents into PDE format, the only electronic format in which documents can be e-filed version of PDF reader and writer that I will be using: Adobe X compatible ml a printer or copier to create required paper copies such as chambers copies. 8. understand that I must regularly review the docket sheet of the case so that I do not miss a filing. 9. [understand that if my use of the ECF system is unsatisfactory, my e-filing privileges may be revoked, and I will be required to file documents in paper. 12/12/2023 /sif (ak Dated Signature ,
Darryl Chadwich Carter Name 1734 Webster Avenue — Bronx NY = 10457 Address City State Zip Code (469) 664-7728 dcclawinfo@legalhotwater.com Telephone Number E-mail Address Application GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to provide Plaintiff with ECF credentials, to terminate ECF No. 5, and to mail a copy of this Order AND a copy of the Court's Order of Service, ECF No. 15, to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. CG E March 21, 2024
ma il Darryl C Carter
C. Carter v. Molly W. Park: 23-cv-10887-JMF, CM/ECF Order Desk NYSD Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 12:22 PM Darryl C Carter
Hi Darryl,
Please advise as to what Pacer login you will be using to file in 23cv10887.
V. Bart Help Desk Services United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 (212) 805 — 0800 ext. 2
[Quoted text hidden]
G ma i| Darryl C Carter
C. Carter v. Molly W. Park: 23-cv-10887-JMF, CM/ECF Order Desk NYSD Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 11:06 AN Darryl C Carter
Good morning,
Please clarify what you need from the Help Desk.
B. Cong Help Desk Services United District Courts Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 (212)-805-0800, ext 2
From: Darryl C Carter Sent: Monday, March 25, 2024 10:56 AM To: Help Desk NYSD Cc: Darryl C Carter Subject: Darryl C. Carter v. Molly W. Park: 23-cv-10887-JMF, CM/ECF Order
CAUTION - EXTERNAL: [Quoted text hidden] CAUTION - EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated outside the Judiciary. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links.
ma i| Darryl C Carter
C. Carter v. Molly W. Park: 23-cv-10887-JMF, CM/ECF Order C Carter Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 11:13 AM Help Desk NYSD NYSD CM/ECF Helpdesk , Darryl C Carter Darryl C Carter | need filing access for my existing pacer account which is what the Order requests. | am an existing filer, which you can verify via case number Darryl C. Carter v. Keechant L. Sewell, 23-cv-1139-JLR, so my existing cm/ecf account needs to be linked to this case number per the attached Order which would permit filing and other CM features. Thank You, If you require any further information please let me know but | suspect if you locate the other case I.e. Sewell, you will have all the information required to fulfill the request. And the email address from which you are forwarding this requested, highlighted in yellow, if that is supposed to mean something, is not the email address associated with Helpdesk for this court. Thank You, Darryl [Quoted text hidden]