Carter v. Park

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided March 26, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-10887·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X : DARRYL C. CARTER, : : Plaintiff, : : 23-CV-10887 (JMF) -v- : : ORDER MOLLY WASOW PARK, et al., : : Defendants. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X

JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: On March 21, 2024, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for permission for electronic case filing. See ECF No. 16. On March 25, 2024, Plaintiff emailed and called the Court, violating the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Pro Se Cases (available at http:// nysd.uscourts.gov/judge/Furman), which prohibit pro se Plaintiffs from directly contacting Chambers. Plaintiff’s email (a copy of which is attached) includes an attachment of emails with the ECF Help Desk, in which Plaintiff repeatedly uses inappropriate and inflammatory language. He also references another case in which he had access to electronic case filing, Carter v. Sewell, 23-CV-1139 (JLR). Upon review of that docket, and in light of Plaintiff’s submissions of March 25, 2024, the Court concludes that Plaintiff should not be permitted access to electronic filing in this case. Accordingly, the Court’s March 21, 2024 endorsement granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing is VACATED (although the Clerk of Court should leave it on the docket), see ECF No. 16, and the Clerk of Court is directed not to provide Plaintiff with ECF privileges (or, if they have already been granted, to rescind them). Plaintiff is reminded that he may not contact Chambers directly, including but not limited to telephone, email, or regular mail. Instead, all communications with the Court must be made through the Pro Se Office in accordance with the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Pro Se Cases. Failure to comply with this Order and those restrictions, and future filings of an inappropriate or inflammatory nature, may result in sanctions, including dismissal of this case. This Court certifies, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and in forma pauperis status is thus denied. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and, as noted above, directed not to provide Plaintiff with ECF privileges (or, if they have already been granted, to rescind them).

SO ORDERED. Dated: March 26, 2024 New York, New York JESS RMAN nited States District Judge

FTroo:m: DFuarrmryal nC NCYaSrtDe rChambers Cc: Darryl C Carter Subject: Darryl C. Carter v. Molly W. Park: 23-cv-10887-JMF, Issue with the Court"s Order Date: Monday, March 25, 2024 8:55:43 PM Attachments: Darryl C. Carter v. Molly W. Park_ 23-cv-10887-JMF.pdf 23cv10887_helpdesk_order_032514.pdf CAUTION - EXTERNAL: Hon. Jesse M. Furman Chambers: Please be advised that I hope to only say this once and to make my point resoundingly clear. It is imperative that you take off any rose colored glasses which you may have and realize that these negroes and this WOKE/SWAMP mob are engaging in all manners of fraud and criminal misconduct including the illegal monitoring of my internet connection and illegally wiretapping of my voice communications. They are hell bent on some type of doctored up fraudulent judgment and my case(s) have been targeted because they are Pro Se and pro se cases are treated in an inferior manner by this district, generally, which lends opportunity for them to engage in fraud. This is not a one or two person scheme, it is very well organized. To that end, it might be necessary for the court to be far more vigilant in this case and any matter with my name on it that comes through this court. As to the specific request, it simply involves fulfillment of the CM/ECF request which is so complicated for the ECF Helpdesk to fulfill (which is their pretext for the back channel fraud activity). Rather than file unnecessary papers, I would like to see how the court would like to proceed on this matter, it may be as simple as your deputy clerk making a five minute phone call to the ECF helpdesk to clear up the matter, so we can move on. Sorry for this stupid correspondence, but that is where we are at today, the cesspool land of NYC and their never ending fraud schemes wasting your time and mine, at least your time is paid, my time is not. See two (2) pdfs attached for the complete context. Regards, CAUTION - EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated outside the Judiciary. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links. 8:39 PM Grnail - Darryl C. Carter v. Molly W. Park: 23-cv-10887-JMF, CM/ECF Order

G mail Darryl C Carter

Darryl C. Carter v. Molly W. Park: 23-cv-10887-JMF, CM/ECF Order & messages Darryl C Carter Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 10:56 AM To: NYSD CM/ECF Helpdesk Cc: Darryl C Carter Bee: Darryl C Carter Dear nysd helpdesk: Please see the attached Order. Regards, Darryl 23cv10887_helpdesk_order_032514.pdf — 500K

Help Desk NYSD Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 11:06 AM Ta: Darryl C Carter Good morning,

Please clavify what you need from the Help Desk.

B. Cong Help Desk Services United District Courts Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 (212)-805-0800, ext 2

From: Darryl C Carter Sent: Monday, March 25, 2024 10:56 AM To: Help Desk NYSD Cc: Darryl C Carter Subject: Darryl C. Carter v. Molly W. Park: 23-cv-L0887-JMF, CM/ECF Order

CAUTION - EXTERNAL:

8:39 PM Gmail - Darryl C. Carter v, Molly W, Park: 23-cv-10887-[MF, CM/ECF Order [Quoted text hidden] CAUTION - EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated outside the Judiciary. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links.

Darryl C Carter Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 11:13 AM To: Help Desk NYSD Cec: NYSD CM/ECF Helpdesk , Darryl C Carter Bee: Darryl C Carter | need filing access for my existing pacer account which is what the Order requests. | am an existing filer, which you can verify via case number Darryl C. Carter v. Keechant L. Sewell, 23-cv-1139-JLR, so my existing cm/ecf account needs to be linked to this case number per the attached Order which would permit filing and other CM features. Thank You, If you require any further information please let me know but | suspect if you locate the other case i.e. Sewell, you will have all the information required to fulfill the request. And the email address from which you are forwarding this requested, highlighted in yellow, if that is supposed to mean something, is not the email address associated with Helpdesk for this court. Thank You, Darry! [Quoted text hidden] Darryl C Carter Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 11:23 AM To: PACER System , Darryl C Carter Bec: Darryl C Carter PACER: Perhaps you need to help the local district court (black and asian alliance helpdesk fraud) on how to assign cm/ecf filing access. Regards, Darryl [Quoted text hidden] Darry! C Carter Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 11:27 AM To: GAO Fraud , USDOJ Criminal Division Bee: Darryl C Carter

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carter v. Park, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Carter v. Park (Carter v. Park) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)