Carrion v. McIntosh

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided May 3, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-07374·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wn KX JOSE CARRION, Petitioner, 23 CIVIL 7374 (JMF) -against- JUDGMENT MRS. MCINTOSH, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent. we K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated April 11, 2024, Carrion's Petition must be and is DISMISSED. As Carrion has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); see also, e.g., Matthews v. United States, 682 F.3d 180, 185 (2d Cir. 2012). In addition, this Court certifies, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith, and in forma pauperis status is thus denied. See, e.g., Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed. DATED: New York, New York May 3, 2024

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: aK MANGO Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carrion v. McIntosh, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Carrion v. McIntosh (Carrion v. McIntosh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Matthews v. United States
682 F.3d 180 (Second Circuit, 2012)