Carretta v. Evans
This text of 254 A.D. 773 (Carretta v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from resettled order referring plaintiff’s motion for a deficiency judgment in an action for the foreclosure of a mortgage to an official referee to take evidence and report, with Ms opinion, dismissed, without costs, on the ground that it is not appealable. (Luttenberger v. Alpert Woodworking Cprp., 252 App. Div. 862; War show v. Herron, 254 id. 699.) The entry of a deficiency judgment may not be upheld, in view of our decision in Clinton Trust Company v. Mahoney (252 App. Div. 763). Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 A.D. 773, 4 N.Y.S.2d 896, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carretta-v-evans-nyappdiv-1938.