Bazel v. Bazel
This text of 282 A.D. 952 (Bazel v. Bazel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendant from an order which referred plaintiff’s motion for an order increasing the amount of support for plaintiff and the children of the parties, and for other relief, to an Official Referee to hear and report. Appeal dismissed, without costs. The order is not appealable. (Luttenberger v. Alpert Woodworking Gorp., 252 App. Div. 862; Warshow v. Herron, 254 App. Div. 699; Carretta v. Evans, 254 App. Div. 773; Manufacturers Trust Go. v. Madgo Realty Gorp., 256 App. Div. 954; Haubrich v. Haubrich, 267 App. Div. 872; Matter of Hipp, 282 App. Div. 880.) Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
282 A.D. 952, 125 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bazel-v-bazel-nyappdiv-1953.