Lennox v. Brady

279 A.D. 663, 107 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3385
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 14, 1951
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 279 A.D. 663 (Lennox v. Brady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lennox v. Brady, 279 A.D. 663, 107 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3385 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

The order of reference to the Official Referee is not appealable. (Haubrich v. Haubrich, 267 App. Div. 872; Carretta v. Evans, 254 App. Div. 773; Matter of Greenwald [United Kitchen Equipment Co.], 248 App. Div. 904; Luttenberger v. Alpert Woodworking Corp., 252 App. Div. 862.) The order appealed from is not in form to permit this court to pass upon the question of the power of Special Term to adopt the procedure followed, in the face of substantial dispute and real controversy as to the existence of any indebtedness from the third party to the judgment debtor. (Kenney v. South Shore Natural Gas & Fuel Co., 201 N. Y. 89, 92; Drivas v. Lekas, 265 App. Div. 818; Haubrich v. Haubrich, supra.) In the event that hearings be had before the Official Referee, appellants may by proper objection before the Referee avoid consent and acquiescence in the adopted practice. (Matter of Powley v. Dorland Bldg. Co., 281 N. Y. 423.) Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davidson v. Sterngass
279 A.D. 875 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D. 663, 107 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lennox-v-brady-nyappdiv-1951.