Cargill v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6084

FREDERICK ANTHONY CARGILL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:09-cv-00861-JAB-PTS)

Submitted: August 6, 2010 Decided: September 10, 2010

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick Anthony Cargill, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Frederick Anthony Cargill appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his motion for a writ pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a)

(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Cargill v. United States, No. 1:09-cv-

00861-JAB-PTS (M.D.N.C. Dec. 30, 2009). We grant leave to

proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED