Cargill v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Cargill v. United States

394 F. App'x 981

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 10, 2010·No. No. 10-6084·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Anthony Cargill appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his motion for a writ pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cargill v. United States, No. 1:09-cv-00861-JAB-PTS (M.D.N.C. Dec. 30, 2009). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. [982]*982We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Anthony Cargill appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his motion for a writ pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cargill v. United States, No. 1:09-cv-00861-JAB-PTS (M.D.N.C. Dec. 30, 2009). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. [982]*982We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cargill v. United States, 394 F. App'x 981 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

394 F. App'x 981 (Cargill v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related