Home/New York Court of Appeals/Carey v. Oswego County Legislature

Carey v. Oswego County Legislature

453 N.E.2d 541, 59 N.Y.2d 847, 466 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3184
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 9, 1983
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 453 N.E.2d 541 (Carey v. Oswego County Legislature) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carey v. Oswego County Legislature, 453 N.E.2d 541, 59 N.Y.2d 847, 466 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3184 (N.Y. 1983).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice John T. Casey at the Appellate Division, except that we express no view on the question of venue, which issue has been apparently abandoned by the parties. We note, in addition, that notwithstanding the fact that the appeal has been rendered moot by the election of a District Attorney, we deem it appropriate to reach the merits because of the substantial importance and recurring nature of the issue presented.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoerger v. Spota
997 N.E.2d 1229 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)
Hoerger v. Spota
109 A.D.3d 564 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Wood v. County of Cortland
23 Misc. 3d 913 (New York Supreme Court, 2009)
Blass v. Cuomo
168 A.D.2d 54 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Opn. No.
New York Attorney General Reports, 1991
Perales v. Heimbach
166 A.D.2d 707 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Blass v. Cuomo
145 Misc. 2d 670 (New York Supreme Court, 1989)
Baez v. Hennessy
853 F.2d 73 (Second Circuit, 1988)
William Padua Baez v. Richard A. Hennessy, Jr., Individually and in His Official Capacity as District Attorney for Onondaga County, the County of Onondaga and Gary J. Corbett, Richard A. Hennessy, Jr., Individually and in His Official Capacity as District Attorney for Onondaga County, William Padua Baez v. Richard A. Hennessy, Jr., Individually and in His Official Capacity as District Attorney for Onondaga County, the County of Onondaga and Gary J. Corbett, the County of Onondaga
853 F.2d 73 (Second Circuit, 1988)
Baranello v. Suffolk County Legislature
126 A.D.2d 296 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Cuomo v. Chemung County Legislature
122 Misc. 2d 42 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
453 N.E.2d 541, 59 N.Y.2d 847, 466 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carey-v-oswego-county-legislature-ny-1983.