Cardiello v. Money Store

Second Circuit

Cardiello v. Money Store

29 F. App'x 780

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMarch 15, 2002

DocketNo. 01-7774

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 29 F. App'x 780 (Cardiello v. Money Store) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cardiello v. Money Store, 29 F. App'x 780 (2d Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be AFFIRMED substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Bu[781]*781chwald’s Memorandum and Order dated May 31, 2001. Appellants’ Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) claim is barred by the one-year statute of limitations. See 15 U.S.C. 1640(e). Moreover, Appellants’ claim fails on the merits; they have not demonstrated that Appellees violated TILA.

We affirm the District Court’s dismissal of Plaintiffs Appellants’ claim under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and their claim to enforce the Federal Trade Commission agreement for the reasons stated in Judge Buchwald’s Memorandum and Order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be AFFIRMED substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Bu[781]*781chwald’s Memorandum and Order dated May 31, 2001. Appellants’ Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) claim is barred by the one-year statute of limitations. See 15 U.S.C. 1640(e). Moreover, Appellants’ claim fails on the merits; they have not demonstrated that Appellees violated TILA.

We affirm the District Court’s dismissal of Plaintiffs Appellants’ claim under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and their claim to enforce the Federal Trade Commission agreement for the reasons stated in Judge Buchwald’s Memorandum and Order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 F. App'x 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cardiello-v-money-store-ca2-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack