Capital Broadcasting Co. v. Acting Attorney General

405 U.S. 1000
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 27, 1972
DocketNo. 71-891
StatusPublished
Cited by40 cases

This text of 405 U.S. 1000 (Capital Broadcasting Co. v. Acting Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Capital Broadcasting Co. v. Acting Attorney General, 405 U.S. 1000 (1972).

Opinion

Appeal from D. C. D. C. Motion of John F. Banzhaf III et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae and to dispense with printing granted. Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Brennan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion or appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.
Supreme Court, 2011
Mylett v. Mullican
Fifth Circuit, 1993
Christopher James Mylett v. David M. Mullican
992 F.2d 1347 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)
Adolph Coors Co. v. Brady
944 F.2d 1543 (Tenth Circuit, 1991)
Adolph Coors Company v. Brady
944 F.2d 1543 (Tenth Circuit, 1991)
Matter of Felmeister
471 A.2d 775 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1984)
Dunagin v. City of Oxford
718 F.2d 738 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)
Gasser v. Morgan
498 F. Supp. 1154 (N.D. Alabama, 1980)
Zarate v. Younglove
86 F.R.D. 80 (C.D. California, 1980)
Foley v. Alabama State Bar
481 F. Supp. 1308 (N.D. Alabama, 1979)
Commonwealth v. Pittsburgh Press Co.
396 A.2d 1187 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
Bates v. State Bar of Arizona
433 U.S. 350 (Supreme Court, 1977)
Borough of Collingswood v. Ringgold
331 A.2d 262 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
405 U.S. 1000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capital-broadcasting-co-v-acting-attorney-general-scotus-1972.