Capital Broadcasting Co. v. Acting Attorney General

405 U.S. 1000
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 27, 1972·No. No. 71-891·Published·Cited by 40 cases

Opinion

Appeal from D. C. D. C. Motion of John F. Banzhaf III et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae and to dispense with printing granted. Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Brennan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion or appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Capital Broadcasting Co. v. Acting Attorney General, 405 U.S. 1000 (1972).

405 U.S. 1000 (Capital Broadcasting Co. v. Acting Attorney General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.
Supreme Court, 2011
Mylett v. Mullican
Fifth Circuit, 1993
Christopher James Mylett v. David M. Mullican
992 F.2d 1347 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)
Adolph Coors Co. v. Brady
944 F.2d 1543 (Tenth Circuit, 1991)
Adolph Coors Company v. Brady
944 F.2d 1543 (Tenth Circuit, 1991)
Matter of Felmeister
471 A.2d 775 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1984)
Dunagin v. City of Oxford
718 F.2d 738 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)
Gasser v. Morgan
498 F. Supp. 1154 (N.D. Alabama, 1980)
Zarate v. Younglove
86 F.R.D. 80 (C.D. California, 1980)
Foley v. Alabama State Bar
481 F. Supp. 1308 (N.D. Alabama, 1979)
Commonwealth v. Pittsburgh Press Co.
396 A.2d 1187 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
Bates v. State Bar of Arizona
433 U.S. 350 (Supreme Court, 1977)
Borough of Collingswood v. Ringgold
331 A.2d 262 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1975)