Cantero v. Russo

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 4, 2019·No. 1:19-cv-08596·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOSE LUIS CANTERO, Plaintiff, 19-CV-8596 (CM) -against- ORDER KEVIN RUSSO, et al., Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff Jose Luis Cantero, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP), filed this complaint alleging that Defendants violated his constitutional rights. Maria Juana Guaman Quizhni, Plaintiff’s fiancé, was listed as a plaintiff in the caption of the complaint, but Quizhni did not sign the complaint or submit an IFP application, and there were no allegations in the complaint suggesting that Defendants had violated Quizhni’s federally protected rights.1 By order dated September 24, 2019, the Court dismissed Cantero’s claims, and granted him leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. The Court dismissed Quizhni as a plaintiff without prejudice to any action she might wish to bring on her own behalf. (ECF 1:19-CV-8596, 6). Cantero and Quizhni have now submitted a joint letter stating that Cantero “will no longer proceed in this matter as all claims have been denied,” but that Quizhni “will continue to proceed to seek relief for the” constitutional violations set forth in the original complaint. (ECF No. 9.) The Court granted Cantero thirty days to replead his claims, but it appears that he does not intend to file an amended complaint. In an abundance of caution, the Court grants Cantero

1 Cantero was incarcerated at the Rockland County Jail when he filed this complaint, but has been released. Cantero provided an updated address, and appears to be residing with Quizhni. fifteen days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint. If Plaintiff does not submit an amended complaint within that time, the action will be dismissed for the reasons set forth in the September 24, 2019 order. In the alternative, Cantero may submit a letter stating that he wishes to withdraw this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). The September 24, 2019 order alerted Quizhni that she cannot proceed in this matter because she did not sign the complaint or submit an IFP application. Should Quizhni wish to file an action on her own behalf, she must file a signed complaint and IFP application. In the complaint, Quizhni must allege facts showing that any named defendants violated her federally protected rights. Attached to this order are a blank complaint form and IFP application. CONCLUSION The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Cantero and Quizhni, and note service on the docket. If Cantero fails to file an amended complaint within fifteen days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed for the reasons set forth in the September 24, 2019 order. Alternatively, Cantero may move to withdraw this action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: December 4, 2019 , New York, New York hie. Ib Wk Chief United States District Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Write the full name of each plaintiff. CV (Include case number if one has been assigned) -against- COMPLAINT Do you want a jury trial? L1Yes LINo

Write the full name of each defendant. If you need more space, please write “see attached” in the space above and attach an additional sheet of paper with the full list of names. The names listed above must be identical to those contained in Section Il.

NOTICE The public can access electronic court files. For privacy and security reasons, papers filed with the court should therefore not contain: an individual’s full social security number or full birth date; the full name of a person known to be a minor; or a complete financial account number. A filing may include only: the last four digits of a social security number; the year of an individual’s birth; a minor’s initials; and the last four digits of a financial account number. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2.

Rev. 1/9/17

I. BASIS FOR JURISDICTION Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction (limited power). Generally, only two types of cases can be heard in federal court: cases involving a federal question and cases involving diversity of citizenship of the parties. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, a case arising under the United States Constitution or federal laws or treaties is a federal question case. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, a case in which a citizen of one State sues a citizen of another State or nation, and the amount in controversy is more than $75,000, is a diversity case. In a diversity case, no defendant may be a citizen of the same State as any plaintiff. What is the basis for federal-court jurisdiction in your case? Federal Question Diversity of Citizenship A. If you checked Federal Question Which of your federal constitutional or federal statutory rights have been violated?

B. If you checked Diversity of Citizenship 1. Citizenship of the parties Of what State is each party a citizen? The plaintiff , , is a citizen of the State of (Plaintiffs name)

(State in which the person resides and intends to remain.) or, if not lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States, a citizen or subject of the foreign state of

If more than one plaintiff is named in the complaint, attach additional pages providing information for each additional plaintiff.

Page 2

If the defendant is an individual: The defendant, , is a citizen of the State of (Defendant’s name)

or, if not lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States, a citizen or subject of the foreign state of

If the defendant is a corporation: The defendant, , is incorporated under the laws of the State of and has its principal place of business in the State of or is incorporated under the laws of (foreign state) and has its principal place of business in . If more than one defendant is named in the complaint, attach additional pages providing information for each additional defendant.

II. PARTIES A. Plaintiff Information Provide the following information for each plaintiff named in the complaint. Attach additional pages if needed.

First Name Middle Initial Last Name

Street Address

County, City State Zip Code

Telephone Number Email Address (if available)

Page 3

B. Defendant Information To the best of your ability, provide addresses where each defendant may be served. If the correct information is not provided, it could delay or prevent service of the complaint on the defendant. Make sure that the defendants listed below are the same as those listed in the caption. Attach additional pages if needed. Defendant 1: First Name Last Name

Current Job Title (or other identifying information) Current Work Address (or other address where defendant may be served) County, City State Zip Code

Defendant 2: First Name Last Name

Current Job Title (or other identifying information)

Current Work Address (or other address where defendant may be served)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cantero v. Russo, (S.D.N.Y. 2019).

Cantero v. Russo (Cantero v. Russo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)