Canfield v. Giles
182 A.D.2d 1075
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 24, 1992·No. Appeal No. 2·Published·Cited by 12 cases
Opinions
Order affirmed without costs. Same Memorandum as in Canfield v Giles ([appeal No. 1] 182 AD2d 1075 [decided herewith]).
All concur, except Fallon, J., who dissents and votes to reverse in the following Memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Canfield v. Giles, 182 A.D.2d 1075 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).
182 A.D.2d 1075 (Canfield v. Giles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
SHAW, THEODORE J. v. ROSHA ENTERPRISES, INC.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
Shaw v. Rosha Enterprises, Inc.
129 A.D.3d 1574 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
VERKEY, DENNIS v. HEBARD, JR., ROY F.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
Verkey v. Hebard
99 A.D.3d 1205 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Kelley v. Kronenberg
2 A.D.3d 1406 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Harris v. Moyer
255 A.D.2d 890 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Kaiser v. Metropolitan Transit Authority
170 Misc. 2d 321 (New York Supreme Court, 1996)
Guarino v. Woodworth
204 A.D.2d 391 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Canfield v. Giles
182 A.D.2d 1075 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)