Campbell v. Cutler Hammer, Inc.
Opinions
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit,
"Does contributory negligence bar recovery in an [Alabama Extended Manufacturer's Liability Doctrine ("AEMLD")] case if a proximate cause of the accident was the unreasonably dangerous condition of the product, but a contributing proximate cause of the accident was the plaintiff's failure to use reasonable care [in using the product]?"
We answer the certified question in the affirmative. SeeGeneral Motors Corp. v. Saint,
QUESTION ANSWERED.
MADDOX, ALMON, SHORES and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.
HORNSBY, C.J., concurs in part and dissents in part.
KENNEDY, INGRAM and COOK, JJ., dissent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
646 So. 2d 573 (Campbell v. Cutler Hammer, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.