Calhoun v. Yonkers Police Department

• Court: District Court, S.D. New York
• Decided: August 18, 2025
• Docket: 7:25-cv-04789
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LETROY CALHOUN, Plaintiff, 25-CV-4789 (JGLC) -against- ORDER OF SERVICE YONKERS POLICE DEPT., et al., Defendants. JESSICA G. L. CLARKE, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Letroy Calhoun, who is currently held in the Westchester County Jail (“WCJ”), brings this action pro se, asserting claims of federal constitutional violations as well as other claims, and seeking damages. He sues: (1) the Yonkers Police Department (the “YPD”); (2) the County of Westchester; and (3) what appear to be multiple unidentified members of the YPD (including “John Doe” defendants). The Court construes Plaintiff’s complaint as asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as comparable claims under state law. By order dated June 12, 2025, the court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), that is, without prepayment of fees.1 For the following reasons, the Court dismisses Plaintiff’s claims against the YPD, and directs the Clerk of Court to add the City of Yonkers as a defendant under Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 21”). The Court also directs service on the City of Yonkers, and directs the Corporation Counsel of the City of Yonkers to provide to Plaintiff and to the Court the full identities, badge numbers, and service addresses of the unidentified defendants. The Court further drops, under Rule 21, the County of Westchester as a defendant without prejudice.

1 Prisoners are not exempt from paying the full filing fee, even when they have been granted permission to proceed IFP. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). STANDARD OF REVIEW The Prison Litigation Reform Act requires that federal courts screen complaints brought by prisoners who seek relief against a governmental entity or an officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a prisoner’s IFP complaint, or any portion of the complaint, that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A(b); see Abbas v. Dixon, 480 F.3d 636, 639 (2d Cir. 2007). The Court must also dismiss a complaint if the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction of the claims raised. See FED. R. CIV. P. 12(h)(3). While the law mandates dismissal on any of these grounds, the Court is obliged to construe pro se pleadings liberally, Harris v. Mills, 572 F.3d 66, 72 (2d Cir. 2009), and interpret them to raise the “strongest [claims] that they suggest,” Triestman v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 470 F.3d 471, 474 (2d Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). But the “special solicitude” in pro se cases, id. at 475 (citation omitted), has its limits – to state a claim, pro se pleadings still must comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 8”),

which requires a complaint to make a short and plain statement showing that the pleader is entitled to relief. Rule 8 requires a complaint to include enough facts to state a claim for relief “that is plausible on its face.” Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). A claim is facially plausible if the plaintiff pleads enough factual detail to allow the Court to draw the inference that the defendant is liable for the alleged misconduct. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). In reviewing the complaint, the Court must accept all well-pleaded factual allegations as true. Id. But it does not have to accept as true “[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action,” which are essentially just legal conclusions. Id. (citing Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555). After separating legal conclusions from well-pleaded factual allegations, the Court must determine whether those facts make it plausible – not merely possible – that the pleader is entitled to relief. Id. at 679. DISCUSSION A. The YPD The Court must dismiss Plaintiff’s claims against the YPD because, as an agency of the

City of Yonkers, it is not a suable entity. See Smith v. Westhab Traverse House, No. 24-CV-4961 (LTS), 2025 WL 26067, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 2, 2025); see also Omnipoint Commc’ns, Inc. v. Town of LaGrange, 658 F. Supp. 2d 539, 552 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (“In New York, agencies of a municipality are not suable entities. The only proper defendant in a lawsuit against an agency of a municipality is the municipality itself, not the agency through which the municipality acted.”); Hall v. City of White Plains, 185 F. Supp. 2d 293, 303 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) (“Under New York law, departments which are merely administrative arms of a municipality[] do not have a legal identity separate and apart from the municipality and cannot sue or be sued.”); see also N.Y. GEN. MUN. LAW § 2 (McKinney 2025) (“The term ‘municipal corporation,’ as used in this chapter, includes only a county, town, city and village.”); Edwards v. Arocho, 125 F.4th 336, 354

(2d Cir. 2024) (“A plaintiff cannot bring a claim against a municipal agency that does not have the capacity to be sued under its municipal charter.” (emphasis in original)). The Court therefore dismisses Plaintiff’s claims against the YPD. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). B. The County of Westchester and the City of Yonkers Under Rule 21, the Court, on its own motion, “may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party.” FED. R. CIV. P. 21; see Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich, Ltd., 118 F. Supp. 3d 591, 618–19 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) (Rule 21 “afford[s] courts discretion to shape litigation in the interests of efficiency and justice.”). A court can, under Rule 21, drop a defendant from an action when the plaintiff “alleges nothing about [that] named defendant[] and therefore has not stated a claim against [it] or shown that [it is] properly joined to th[e] action.” Ponce-Melendres v. Doe Orange Cnty. Jail Admin. Off., No. 20-CV-7710 (VB), 2020 WL 7343025, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 2020); see Tanjucto v. NYLife Secs. LLC, No. 23-CV-4889 (BCM), 2024 WL 1258385, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2024). Other than alleging that the unidentified defendants brought Plaintiff

to the WCJ—a facility owned and operated by the County of Westchester—after they arrested him and that he is currently held there, Plaintiff alleges nothing about the County of Westchester. The Court, therefore, under Rule 21, terminates the County of Westchester as a defendant at this time. However, this is without prejudice to Plaintiff’s ability, if he so chooses, to file an amended complaint in which he names the County of Westchester again as a defendant and alleges facts about it, specifically, how it has injured him with respect to the incident that is the basis of his claims in this action. Courts have also added, under that same rule, a municipality as a defendant in an action, though that municipality is not named as a defendant in the complaint, because it was clear that

the plaintiff intended to name the municipality as a defendant but mistakenly did not do so. See, e.g., Glover v. N.Y.C. Dep’t of Corrs., 25-CV-1174 (KMK), 2025 WL 756327, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 18, 2025); Bien-Aime v. DOCCS, No. 24-CV-8797 (JHR) (BCM), 2025 WL 415771, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 6, 2025); Pearson v. O.C.J. Goshen, N.Y., 24-CV-8254 (KMK), 2025 WL 370965, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 3, 2025); Ballentine v. NYCPD, No. 24-CV-6121 (MKV), 2024 WL 4556003, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 22, 2024); Owens v. Orange Cnty. Jail, 22-CV-6754 (CS), 2022 WL 4449229, at *1-2 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 23, 2022). That is so because a court may add a party to an action, under Rule 21, when it is clear that the plaintiff intended to name that party as a defendant, but inadvertently failed to do so. See Fullewellen v. City of New York, No. 21-CV- 7219 (MKV), 2021 WL 4940984, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 14, 2021); see also Truncale v. Universal Pictures Co., 82 F. Supp. 576, 578 (S.D.N.Y. 1949) (“In so far as [Rule 21] relates to the addition of parties, it is intended to permit the bringing in of a person who, through inadvertence, mistake or for some other reason, had not been made a party and whose presence as a party is later found necessary or desirable.”).

Plaintiff does not name the City of Yonkers as a defendant. In naming the YPD, an agency of the City of Yonkers, as a defendant, however, it appears that he intended to name the City of Yonkers as a defendant in this action. In light of Plaintiff’s pro se status and his allegations, the Court understands Plaintiff’s complaint as asserting claims against the City of Yonkers. Accordingly, the Court directs the Clerk of Court to add as a defendant in this action, under Rule 21, the City of Yonkers. This amendment is without prejudice to any defenses the City of Yonkers may wish to assert. C. Service on the City of Yonkers The Court understands Plaintiff’s complaint as asserting claims under Section 1983 and/or under state law against the City of Yonkers. Because Plaintiff has been granted permission

to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on assistance from the Court and the United States Marshals Service (“USMS”) to effect service.2 Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in [IFP] cases.”); FED. R. CIV. P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the USMS to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP).

2Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that a summons be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have effected service until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that any summonses be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve the City of Yonkers until 90 days after the date a summons for the City of Yonkers issues. To allow Plaintiff to effect service on the City of Yonkers through the USMS, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a USMS Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for the City of Yonkers. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue a summons for the City of Yonkers and deliver to the USMS all the paperwork necessary for the USMS to effect service on the City of Yonkers.

If the complaint is not served on the City of Yonkers within 90 days after the date that a summons for the City of Yonkers is issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service). Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss this action if Plaintiff fails to do so. D. Unidentified Defendants Under Valentin v. Dinkins, a pro se litigant is entitled to assistance from the Court in ascertaining an unidentified defendant’s identity and service address. 121 F.3d 72, 76 (2d Cir. 1997). In the complaint, Plaintiff supplies sufficient information to allow the YPD to determine

the full identity, badge number, and service address of each of the unidentified defendants; those defendants include all of the members of the YPD that, on or about May 13, 2025, entered the apartment at 564 South Broadway, in Yonkers, New York, in which Plaintiff was found, arrested Plaintiff there, and/or escorted Plaintiff to the WCJ. It is therefore ordered that the Corporation Counsel of the City of Yonkers, who is the attorney for and agent of the YPD must ascertain the identity, badge number, and service address of each of the abovementioned unidentified defendants. The Corporation Counsel must provide this information to Plaintiff and to the Court within 60 days of the date of this order. Within 30 days of receiving this information, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint naming each of the newly identified individuals as a defendant and providing his or her badge number and service address. The amended complaint will replace, not supplement, the original complaint. An amended complaint form that Plaintiff should complete is attached to this order. Once Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint, the Court will screen it and, if necessary, issue an

order directing service on the newly identified defendants. An amended complaint form is attached to this order. CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, the Court dismisses Plaintiff’s claims against the Yonkers Police Department, and further directs the Clerk of Court to add, under Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the City of Yonkers as a defendant in this action. The Court additionally directs the Clerk of Court to terminate, under that same rule, the County of Westchester as a defendant in this action without prejudice. The Court further, and respectfully, directs the Clerk of Court to: (1) issue a summons for the City of Yonkers; (2) complete a USM-285 form with the service address for the City of

Yonkers; and (3) deliver all documents necessary to effect service of a summons and the complaint on the City of Yonkers to the USMS. The Court also directs the Clerk of Court to mail an information package to Plaintiff, as well as a copy of this order and a copy of the complaint to the Corporation Counsel of the City of Yonkers, at 40 South Broadway, #300, Yonkers, New York 10701. The Court certifies, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). Dated: August 18, 2025 New York, New York SO SRDERED. C He ance (Marke CU JESSICA G. L. CLARKE United States District Judge

SERVICE ADDRESS FOR DEFENDANT

City of Yonkers Corporation Counsel of the City of Yonkers 40 South Broadway, #300 Yonkers, New York 10701 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

_____CV_______________ Write the full name of each plaintiff. (Include case number if one has been assigned)

AMENDED -against- COMPLAINT (Prisoner) Do you want a jury trial? ☐ Yes ☐ No

Write the full name of each defendant. If you cannot fit the names of all of the defendants in the space provided, please write “see attached” in the space above and attach an additional sheet of paper with the full list of names. The names listed above must be identical to those contained in Section IV.

NOTICE The public can access electronic court files. For privacy and security reasons, papers filed with the court should therefore not contain: an individual’s full social security number or full birth date; the full name of a person known to be a minor; or a complete financial account number. A filing may include only: the last four digits of a social security number; the year of an individual’s birth; a minor’s initials; and the last four digits of a financial account number. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. I. LEGAL BASIS FOR CLAIM State below the federal legal basis for your claim, if known. This form is designed primarily for prisoners challenging the constitutionality of their conditions of confinement; those claims are often brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (against state, county, or municipal defendants) or in a “Bivens” action (against federal defendants). ☐ Violation of my federal constitutional rights ☐ Other: II. PLAINTIFF INFORMATION Each plaintiff must provide the following information. Attach additional pages if necessary.

First Name Middle Initial Last Name

State any other names (or different forms of your name) you have ever used, including any name you have used in previously filing a lawsuit.

Prisoner ID # (if you have previously been in another agency’s custody, please specify each agency and the ID number (such as your DIN or NYSID) under which you were held)

Current Place of Detention

Institutional Address

County, City State Zip Code III. PRISONER STATUS Indicate below whether you are a prisoner or other confined person: ☐ Pretrial detainee ☐ Civilly committed detainee ☐ Immigration detainee ☐ Convicted and sentenced prisoner ☐ Other: IV. DEFENDANT INFORMATION To the best of your ability, provide the following information for each defendant. If the correct information is not provided, it could delay or prevent service of the complaint on the defendant. Make sure that the defendants listed below are identical to those listed in the caption. Attach additional pages as necessary. Defendant 1: First Name Last Name Shield #

Current Job Title (or other identifying information)

Current Work Address

County, City State Zip Code Defendant 2: First Name Last Name Shield #

County, City State Zip Code Defendant 3: First Name Last Name Shield #

County, City State Zip Code Defendant 4: First Name Last Name Shield #

County, City State Zip Code V. STATEMENT OF CLAIM Place(s) of occurrence:

Date(s) of occurrence: FACTS: State here briefly the FACTS that support your case. Describe what happened, how you were harmed, and how each defendant was personally involved in the alleged wrongful actions. Attach additional pages as necessary. INJURIES: If you were injured as a result of these actions, describe your injuries and what medical treatment, if any, you required and received.

VI. RELIEF State briefly what money damages or other relief you want the court to order. VII. PLAINTIFF’S CERTIFICATION AND WARNINGS By signing below, I certify to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief that: (1) the complaint is not being presented for an improper purpose (such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation); (2) the claims are supported by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument to change existing law; (3) the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and (4) the complaint otherwise complies with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. I understand that if I file three or more cases while I am a prisoner that are dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim, I may be denied in forma pauperis status in future cases. I also understand that prisoners must exhaust administrative procedures before filing an action in federal court about prison conditions, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), and that my case may be dismissed if I have not exhausted administrative remedies as required. I agree to provide the Clerk's Office with any changes to my address. I understand that my failure to keep a current address on file with the Clerk's Office may result in the dismissal of my case. Each Plaintiff must sign and date the complaint. Attach additional pages if necessary. If seeking to proceed without prepayment of fees, each plaintiff must also submit an IFP application.

Dated Plaintiff’s Signature

Prison Address

County, City State Zip Code

Date on which I am delivering this complaint to prison authorities for mailing: