Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals Board
This text of 463 N.E.2d 619 (Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Sullivan (94 AD2d 229). We also note that the Board found that the actual occupants of the apartment under the lease were Robert J. Castle and his wife and that the apartment was not their primary residence. That being so, Michael Castle, their son, had no right to renewal of the lease based upon section 235-f of the Real Property Law (L 1983, ch 403).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
463 N.E.2d 619, 61 N.Y.2d 976, 475 N.Y.S.2d 278, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cale-development-co-v-conciliation-appeals-board-ny-1984.