Calamia v. Singletary
This text of 694 So. 2d 733 (Calamia v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Russell CALAMIA, Petitioner,
v.
Harry K. SINGLETARY, Jr., Respondent.
Jeffrey Lynn HOCK, Petitioner,
v.
Harry K. SINGLETARY, Jr. Respondent.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Wendy M. Edmonds and R. Mitchell Prugh of Middleton, Prugh & Anderson, P.A., Melrose, for petitioner Russell Calamia.
*734 John C. Schaible, Florida Institutional Legal Services, Inc., Gainesville, for petitioner Jeffrey Lynn Hock.
Susan A. Maher, Deputy General, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
On petition for writ of certiorari, the United States Supreme Court vacated our previous decision in this cause[1] and remanded the case for further consideration in light of its decision in Lynce v. Mathis, ___ U.S.___, 117 S.Ct. 891, 137 L.Ed.2d 63 (1997). Calamia v. Singletary, ___ U.S.___, 117 S.Ct. 1309, 137 L.Ed.2d 473 (1997). In view of the holding of Lynce, we grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus of Russell Calamia and the petition for writ of mandamus of Jeffrey Lynn Hock. We direct respondent to reinstate the petitioners' administrative and provisional gain time in accordance with the opinion in Lynce v. Mathis.
It is so ordered.
KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] Calamia v. Singletary, 686 So.2d 1337 (Fla. 1996).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
694 So. 2d 733, 1997 WL 273699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calamia-v-singletary-fla-1997.