Cain v. Jett
This text of 157 S.E. 225 (Cain v. Jett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition for certiorari contained no assignment of error upon the final judgment rendered by the justice of the peace in favor of the plaintiff, but excepted only to the overruling of the demurrer to the summons, the rejection of evidence, and “the overruling of the plea in abatement.” Since the petition for certiorari contained no assignment of error upon a final judgment, but complained only of rulings made upon the trial, the proceeding was invalid, and the judge of the [598]*598superior court did not err in refusing the certiorari. Starnes v. Bacon, 25 Ga. App. 260 (3) (103 S. E. 39) ; Birdford Supply Co. v. Edwards, 16 Ga. App. 518 (85 S. E. 687) ; Sullivan v. Levy, 26 Ga. App. 319 (106 S. E. 19) ; City of Tallapoosa v. Brock, 143 Ga. 599 (2) (85 S. E. 755) ; Massengale v. Colonial Hill Co., 34 Ga. App. 807 (131 S. E. 299).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 S.E. 225, 42 Ga. App. 597, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cain-v-jett-gactapp-1931.