Starnes v. Bacon

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Starnes v. Bacon

103 S.E. 39, 25 Ga. App. 260, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 723

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 5, 1920

Docket11010

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 103 S.E. 39 (Starnes v. Bacon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Starnes v. Bacon, 103 S.E. 39, 25 Ga. App. 260, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 723 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. A petition for certiorari must except to a final judgment, and must plainly and distinctly set forth the errors complained of.

2. An exception “ that the judgment entered on such verdict does not follow the verdict,” without alleging wherein such judgment fails to follow the verdict is not a complete and valid assignment of error. Searcy v. Collins, 94 Ga. 642 (20 S. E. 94).

3. A petition for certiorari which contained no valid assignment of error upon a final judgment and which complained only of rulings made upon the trial, was invalid, and the judge did not err in failing to sustain it.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur. Columbus E. Alexander, J. P. Dukes, for plaintiff in error. Lee Cotton, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI