Starnes v. Bacon

103 S.E. 39, 25 Ga. App. 260, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 723
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 5, 1920·No. 11010·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. A petition for certiorari must except to a final judgment, and must plainly and distinctly set forth the errors complained of.

2. An exception “ that the judgment entered on such verdict does not follow the verdict,” without alleging wherein such judgment fails to follow the verdict is not a complete and valid assignment of error. Searcy v. Collins, 94 Ga. 642 (20 S. E. 94).

3. A petition for certiorari which contained no valid assignment of error upon a final judgment and which complained only of rulings made upon the trial, was invalid, and the judge did not err in failing to sustain it.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur. Columbus E. Alexander, J. P. Dukes, for plaintiff in error. Lee Cotton, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Starnes v. Bacon, 103 S.E. 39, 25 Ga. App. 260, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 723 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

103 S.E. 39 (Starnes v. Bacon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stembridge v. Sloan
18 S.E.2d 498 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Cain v. Jett
157 S.E. 225 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Freedman v. Bush
119 S.E. 421 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)