Sullivan v. Levy, Brother & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Sullivan v. Levy, Brother & Co.

106 S.E. 19, 26 Ga. App. 319, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 124

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 15, 1921

Docket11827

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 106 S.E. 19 (Sullivan v. Levy, Brother & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sullivan v. Levy, Brother & Co., 106 S.E. 19, 26 Ga. App. 319, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 124 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, J.

Where in a petition for certiorari the assignments of error were as to specified rulings of the trial court preceding the final judgment, and there was no assignment of error as to the final judgment, because of additional error in it or because of the antecedent error complained of, [320]*320the judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to sanction the certiorari. McCranie v. Shipp, 10 Ga. App. 544 (73 S. E. 701); Lyndon v. Ga. Ry. & Elec. Co., 129 Ga. 353 (58 S. E. 1047).

Decided February 15, 1921.

Petition for certiorari; from Glynn superior court — Judge Higlismitb. August. 20, 1920.

Frank H. Harris, for plaintiff in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI