Caiarelli v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

46 A.3d 643, 616 Pa. 38, 2012 WL 1546816, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 962

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 25, 2012·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2012, the present appeal is DISMISSED as having been improvidently granted.

Justice McCAFFERY files a dissenting statement in which Justice TODD joins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caiarelli v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 46 A.3d 643, 616 Pa. 38, 2012 WL 1546816, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 962 (Pa. 2012).

Pincite

46 A.3d 643 (Caiarelli v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.