Caiarelli v. Sear, Roebuck & Co.
988 A.2d 713, 2009 Pa. Super. LEXIS 5459, 2009 WL 5574384
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 21, 2009
Docket885 WDA 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 988 A.2d 713 (Caiarelli v. Sear, Roebuck & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Caiarelli v. Sear, Roebuck & Co., 988 A.2d 713, 2009 Pa. Super. LEXIS 5459, 2009 WL 5574384 (Pa. Ct. App. 2009).
Opinion
CAIARELLI
v.
SEAR, ROEBUCK & CO.[6]
Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Affirmed.
NOTES
[6] Petition for reargument denied November 24, 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Neal Heimbach v. Amazon.com
942 F.3d 297 (Sixth Circuit, 2019)
Caiarelli v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
46 A.3d 643 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
988 A.2d 713, 2009 Pa. Super. LEXIS 5459, 2009 WL 5574384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caiarelli-v-sear-roebuck-co-pasuperct-2009.