Butler v. Whiteman

356 U.S. 271, 78 S. Ct. 734, 2 L. Ed. 2d 754, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1769
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 14, 1958
Docket200 M
StatusPublished
Cited by105 cases

This text of 356 U.S. 271 (Butler v. Whiteman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butler v. Whiteman, 356 U.S. 271, 78 S. Ct. 734, 2 L. Ed. 2d 754, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1769 (1958).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for trial. We hold that the petitioner's evidence presented an evi-dentiary basis for jury findings as to (1) whether or not the tug G. W. Whiteman was in navigation, Senko v. LaCrosse Dredging Corp., 352 U. S. 370, 373; Carumbo v. Cape Cod S. S. Co., 123 F. 2d 991; (2) whether or not the petitioner’s decedent was a seaman and member of the crew of the tug within the meaning of the Jones Act, 41 Stat. 1007, 46 U. S. C. § 688; Senko v. LaCrosse Dredging Corp., supra; Gianfala v. Texas Co., 350 U. S. 879; South Chicago Co. v. Bassett, 309 U. S. 251; Grimes v. Raymond Concrete Pile Co., 356 U. S. 252; and (3) whether or not employer negligence played a part in producing decedent’s death. Ferguson v. Moor e-McCormack Lines, 352 U. S. 521; Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500; Schulz v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 350 U. S. 523.

For reasons set forth in his opinion in Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500, 524, Mr. Justice [272]*272Frankfurter is of the view that the writ of certiorari is improvidently granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greer v. Continental Gaming Co.
5 S.W.3d 559 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1999)
Chandris, Inc. v. Latsis
515 U.S. 347 (Supreme Court, 1995)
McDermott International, Inc. v. Wilander
498 U.S. 337 (Supreme Court, 1991)
Martin v. John W. Stone Oil Distributor
819 F.2d 547 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)
Mr. & Mrs. Noel Munguia v. Chevron Company, U.S.A.
768 F.2d 649 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)
Bohlinger v. Allied Tankships, Inc.
613 F. Supp. 161 (E.D. Virginia, 1985)
Ramos v. Universal Dredging Corp.
547 F. Supp. 661 (D. Hawaii, 1982)
Eaton v. Connolly-Pacific, Inc.
134 Cal. App. 3d 825 (California Court of Appeal, 1982)
Simko v. Marine Maintenance Co.
594 F.2d 960 (Third Circuit, 1979)
Hubschman v. Antilles Airboats, Inc.
440 F. Supp. 828 (Virgin Islands, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
356 U.S. 271, 78 S. Ct. 734, 2 L. Ed. 2d 754, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-v-whiteman-scotus-1958.