Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Bradley

718 N.E.2d 1272, 87 Ohio St. 3d 213
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 10, 1999
DocketNo. 99-1114
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 718 N.E.2d 1272 (Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Bradley, 718 N.E.2d 1272, 87 Ohio St. 3d 213 (Ohio 1999).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board, to which respondent concurs. A sanction of at least an indefinite [215]*215suspension is warranted for misconduct that includes violations of DR 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(5), 6-101(A)(3), and 9-102(B). See, e.g., Disciplinary Counsel v. Reinstatler (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 220, 556 N.E.2d 521; Disciplinary Counsel v. Hipp (1990), 48 Ohio St.3d 16, 548 N.E.2d 947. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio, and his reinstatement is conditioned on his making restitution of $15,000 to Piazza plus interest at a rate of ten percent per annum from the dates that Piazza gave respondent the checks. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Hoskins
891 N.E.2d 324 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bowman
791 N.E.2d 408 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bradley
1999 Ohio 28 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
718 N.E.2d 1272, 87 Ohio St. 3d 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butler-county-bar-assn-v-bradley-ohio-1999.