Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Bradley

718 N.E.2d 1272, 87 Ohio St. 3d 213
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 10, 1999·No. No. 99-1114·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board, to which respondent concurs. A sanction of at least an indefinite [215] suspension is warranted for misconduct that includes violations of DR 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(5), 6-101(A)(3), and 9-102(B). See, e.g., Disciplinary Counsel v. Reinstatler (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 220, 556 N.E.2d 521; Disciplinary Counsel v. Hipp (1990), 48 Ohio St.3d 16, 548 N.E.2d 947. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio, and his reinstatement is conditioned on his making restitution of $15,000 to Piazza plus interest at a rate of ten percent per annum from the dates that Piazza gave respondent the checks. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Bradley, 718 N.E.2d 1272, 87 Ohio St. 3d 213 (Ohio 1999).

718 N.E.2d 1272 (Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Bradley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Hoskins
891 N.E.2d 324 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bowman
791 N.E.2d 408 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bradley
1999 Ohio 28 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)