Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Reinstatler

556 N.E.2d 521, 52 Ohio St. 3d 220, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 294
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 11, 1990·No. No. 89-2217·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record in this case, we agree with the board’s findings of misconduct. However, we find that an indefinite suspension from the practice of law should be imposed in response to respondent’s violations of the Disciplinary Rules. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Reinstatler, 556 N.E.2d 521, 52 Ohio St. 3d 220, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 294 (Ohio 1990).

556 N.E.2d 521 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Reinstatler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Bradley
718 N.E.2d 1272 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bradley
1999 Ohio 28 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)