Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Reinstatler

556 N.E.2d 521, 52 Ohio St. 3d 220, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 294
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 11, 1990
DocketNo. 89-2217
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 556 N.E.2d 521 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Reinstatler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Reinstatler, 556 N.E.2d 521, 52 Ohio St. 3d 220, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 294 (Ohio 1990).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record in this case, we agree with the board’s findings of misconduct. However, we find that an indefinite suspension from the practice of law should be imposed in response to respondent’s violations of the Disciplinary Rules. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Bradley
718 N.E.2d 1272 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bradley
1999 Ohio 28 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
556 N.E.2d 521, 52 Ohio St. 3d 220, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-reinstatler-ohio-1990.