Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hipp

548 N.E.2d 947, 48 Ohio St. 3d 16, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 20
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 10, 1990·No. No. 89-718·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3), 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(5), 6-101(A)(3), 9-102(A) and 9-102(B), and we adopt the board’s recommendation. Respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hipp, 548 N.E.2d 947, 48 Ohio St. 3d 16, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 20 (Ohio 1990).

548 N.E.2d 947 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hipp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Bradley
718 N.E.2d 1272 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bradley
1999 Ohio 28 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hipp
624 N.E.2d 1056 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1993)