Bush v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Bush v. Southern Pacific Co.

106 Cal. App. 759

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 27, 1930

DocketCiv. No. 4073

StatusPublished

This text of 106 Cal. App. 759 (Bush v. Southern Pacific Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bush v. Southern Pacific Co., 106 Cal. App. 759 (Cal. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for damages sustained by her in the death of her son in a railroad grade-crossing accident. The facts involved in this case and the grounds urged for a reversal of the judgment are substantially the same as those in Bush v. Southern Pacific Co. (Civ. No. 4072), ante, p. 101 [289 Pac. 190], this day decided by this court. In appellants’ opening brief it is said: “By stipulation the same evidence offered and introduced in that action was made a part of the evidence in this case, being tried by the same jury and under the same and additional instructions. ’ ’'

On the grounds stated in the opinion filed in the case referred to the judgment herein is affirmed.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on June 26, 1930, and a petition by appellants to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, - after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on July 24, 1930.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for damages sustained by her in the death of her son in a railroad grade-crossing accident. The facts involved in this case and the grounds urged for a reversal of the judgment are substantially the same as those in Bush v. Southern Pacific Co. (Civ. No. 4072), ante, p. 101 [289 Pac. 190], this day decided by this court. In appellants’ opening brief it is said: “By stipulation the same evidence offered and introduced in that action was made a part of the evidence in this case, being tried by the same jury and under the same and additional instructions. ’ ’'

On the grounds stated in the opinion filed in the case referred to the judgment herein is affirmed.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on June 26, 1930, and a petition by appellants to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, - after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on July 24, 1930.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 Cal. App. 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bush-v-southern-pacific-co-calctapp-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack