Burton v. American Bridge Co.
This text of 80 N.E.2d 366 (Burton v. American Bridge Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is evidence in the record which presented a question of fact for the jury whether at the time of the accident the crane operator, Kemp, was the servant of the defendant American Bridge Company. It was error to hold as a matter of law that he was the ad hoc employee of the Arthur A. Johnson Co. (Bartolomeo v. Bennett Contr. Co., 245 N. Y. 66; Ramsey v. New York Central R. R. Co., 269 N. Y. 219; Kristiansen v. Wagner’s Steel Erectors, Inc., 295 N. Y. 668). The judgments should be reversed, the verdict reinstated and judgment directed to be entered thereon in favor of plaintiff, with costs in all courts.
Loijghban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacheb, Dye and Ftjld, JJ., concur.
Judgments reversed, etc. [See 298 N. Y. —.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
80 N.E.2d 366, 297 N.Y. 993, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 1068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burton-v-american-bridge-co-ny-1948.