Burns v. WARDEN OF SUSSEX I STATE PRISON

609 S.E.2d 608, 269 Va. 351, 2005 Va. LEXIS 33
Supreme Court of Virginia·Decided March 11, 2005·No. Record No. 020971.·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

I agree with the majority's conclusion that, pursuant to the provisions of Code § 8.01-654.2, an individual under a sentence of death that became final before April 29, 2003, who uses a habeas corpus petition as the vehicle to raise a claim of mental retardation is entitled to have that claim adjudicated by a jury, provided the claim is non-frivolous and the individual was originally tried by a jury. However, I reiterate my prior conclusion that Burns failed to present to this Court a non-frivolous claim of mental retardation. See Code § 8.01-654.2. Thus, in my view, Burns is not entitled to have the claim remanded to the Circuit Court of Shenandoah County. For that reason, I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burns v. WARDEN OF SUSSEX I STATE PRISON, 609 S.E.2d 608, 269 Va. 351, 2005 Va. LEXIS 33 (Va. 2005).

609 S.E.2d 608 (Burns v. WARDEN OF SUSSEX I STATE PRISON) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. Kelly
593 F.3d 319 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)
Burns v. Com.
688 S.E.2d 263 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 2010)
Commonwealth v. Bracey
986 A.2d 128 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)
Myers v. State
2005 OK CR 22 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 2005)
Burns v. Warden of Sussex I State Prison
609 S.E.2d 608 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 2005)